Lesson 31: Rescission and Restitution

As part of the remedies available for a breach of contract, rescission and restitution are two equitable remedies that aim to restore the parties to their original position before the contract was formed. These remedies are often used when a contract has been fundamentally breached or when there has been a misrepresentation, fraud, duress, or undue influence. For a deep dive into contract law, check out Contracts: Examples & Explanations by Brian A. Blum.

Rescission

Rescission is the process of canceling the contract and treating it as if it never existed. When a contract is rescinded, both parties are released from their obligations under the contract. The goal is to undo the contract and return the parties to the status quo ante.

Party A and Party B agree to a contract. Later, Party A discovers that Party B misrepresented key information that induced Party A to enter into the contract. Party A seeks rescission, aiming to cancel the contract and restore both parties to their original positions.

Grounds for Rescission

  • Misrepresentation: A false statement of fact that induces a party to enter into the contract.
  • Fraud: Intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain.
  • Duress: Coercion or threat that forces a party to enter into the contract.
  • Undue Influence: Unfair persuasion of a party who is under the domination of the person exercising the persuasion.
  • Mutual Mistake: Both parties are mistaken about a basic assumption on which the contract was made.
Important: To seek rescission, the party must act promptly upon discovering the grounds for rescission and must not have affirmed the contract.

Restitution

Restitution is an equitable remedy that requires a party who has been unjustly enriched at the expense of another to return the benefit received. The purpose of restitution is to prevent unjust enrichment by restoring the injured party to the position they were in before the contract.

Party A pays Party B $10,000 for services that were never rendered. Party A seeks restitution to recover the $10,000, aiming to prevent Party B from being unjustly enriched.

Mechanism of Restitution

Restitution can be claimed in various scenarios, including:

  • Breach of Contract: When one party breaches the contract, the non-breaching party can seek restitution for any benefits conferred.
  • Rescinded Contracts: When a contract is rescinded, both parties must return any benefits they received under the contract.
  • Unjust Enrichment: When one party receives a benefit at the expense of another without a valid basis, restitution can be sought.
Note: Restitution is not limited to contractual relationships. It can also apply to quasi-contracts and other situations where one party has been unjustly enriched.

Example Scenario

Consider the following scenario to understand how rescission and restitution work together:

Limitations and Defenses to Restitution Claims

While restitution aims to prevent unjust enrichment, there are limitations and defenses that can be raised against restitution claims:

  • Change of Position: If the defendant has changed their position in reliance on the received benefit, they may argue that restitution is not appropriate.
  • Good Faith Purchaser: A person who acquires property in good faith and without knowledge of any wrongdoing may be protected from restitution claims.
  • Estoppel: If the claimant has acted in a way that led the defendant to reasonably believe they were entitled to the benefit, the claimant may be estopped from seeking restitution.
  • Statute of Limitations: Claims for restitution must be brought within a specified time period, which varies by jurisdiction.

Calculating Restitution

The calculation of restitution is typically based on the value of the benefit conferred. This can include:

  • The monetary value of services rendered.
  • The market value of goods provided.
  • The savings or profits obtained by the defendant as a result of the benefit.

In some cases, restitution may involve the return of specific property or a monetary equivalent if the return is not feasible.

Judicial Discretion in Awarding Restitution

Courts have significant discretion in awarding restitution. Factors that may influence a court’s decision include:

  • The nature of the unjust enrichment.
  • The conduct of the parties.
  • The feasibility of restoring the status quo.

Courts aim to achieve a fair and equitable outcome, ensuring that restitution serves its purpose of preventing unjust enrichment.

Conclusion

Rescission and restitution are powerful equitable remedies in contract law. They serve to cancel a contract and restore the parties to their original positions. By understanding the grounds for rescission and the mechanisms of restitution, parties can better navigate the complexities of contract breaches and ensure they are not unjustly enriched at the expense of another.

For more information on related topics, you may want to explore other lessons in this instructable, such as:

« Previous
Take the Quiz »